Showing posts with label Islam. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Islam. Show all posts

Saturday, March 5, 2016

Islam has no age barrier for marriage — MURIC Director, Akintola

A professor of Islamic Eschatology and Director of Muslim Rights Concern, Ishaq Akintola, speaks withBAYO AKINLOYE about the abduction saga of Ese Oruru


Is child marriage permitted in Islam, looking beyond the case of Ese Oruru?


Islam is a complete way of life. As a religion, non-Muslims will have to take Muslims as they are, not as they want them to be. Neither Muslims nor their religion should be judged according to other standards. There will never be any inter-religious understanding so long as non-Muslims continue to measure Muslims and their way of life by Christian, Buddhist or Confucianist yardsticks. The simple truth is: Islam has no age barrier in marriage and Muslims have no apology for those who refuse to accept this, particularly since 99.99 per cent of such marriages are conducted among Muslims themselves. If the man is a Muslim and the girl is also a Muslim and the girl’s parents give their approval, what is the business of any non-Muslim in that? It is sheer interference in the affair of Muslims and an attempt to exert undue influence on them. More often than not, those who interfere in this manner have ulterior motives. It is either for the purpose of smearing the image of Islam or to gain a comparative advantage and score a religious point (for their own faith of course).


We are not unaware of all these antics, yet we patiently endure them. Non-Muslims should therefore keep off Muslims’ affairs. Who are non-Muslims to be the judge of Muslims when every religious group has its own failings? This interference often causes unnecessary strain on Christian-Muslim relationship. Despite the fact that our Christian neighbours sing the hymn ‘I want to be like Jesus…’ repeatedly, they are not behaving like Jesus (peace be upon him). Neither are they following his teachings. There will be peace if they do. But they don’t. Jesus taught Christians to mind their own business and to resist the temptation to judge others. He said, ‘Judge not, that you be not judged. For with the judgment you pronounce you will be judged, and the measure that you give will be the measure you get.’


That means your organisation, Muslim Right Concern, supports child marriage?  


I am a Muslim and I support all truly Muslim practices. Our organisation, MURIC, is an Islamic human rights outfit. So naturally we should support all principles of Islam. It promotes Allah-given fundamental human rights as well as Allah-given fundamental rights of all creatures, animals – mammals, invertebrates, birds in the sky, the environment and all natural entities. Everything created by Allah has a right. We promote their rights. MURIC believes in all Shariah-compliant marriages, regardless of the age of the girl. The sensationalisation of intra-Muslim marriages to the so-called minors is uncalled for and, more often than not, done with hidden malice. For your information, we don’t have what you call ‘child marriage’. We have nikah (Islamic marriage). I affirm clearly, emphatically and unequivocally, that what happens among Muslims is strictly a Muslim affair and should remain so as long as it is Shariah-compliant. Non-Muslims have no right to poke their noses into any religious action taken by Muslims for Muslims. Nikah is a marriage of the Muslims conducted by the Muslims for the Muslims. How the Muslims do it is nobody’s business. Do we come into the church to criticise the way marriages are conducted? Have Muslims said anything about gay marriages inside churches? That is the Christian way of life and they should stop attempts to impose their lifestyle on Muslims. We will never allow that. It is an attempt to subject Muslims to public ridicule.


You cannot hold us in contempt and talk about love. It is sheer deceit. It is hypocrisy. Even Jesus (peace be upon him) called those who ignore their own faults to interfere in other people’s matters, hypocrites. He said, “Why do you see the speck that is in your brother’s eye, but do not notice the log that is in your own eye? Or how can you say to your brother, ‘Let me take the speck out of your eye’ when there is a log in your own eye? You hypocrite, first take the log out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to take the speck out of your brother’s eye.” So, instead of paying attention to marriages conducted among Muslims, Christians should do something about gay marriages inside churches.


What is your view on the abduction, forceful marriage and conversion to Islam of Ese Oruru by Yunusa Dahiru?  


MURIC issued a statement on this ugly episode immediately it broke out. Let me pick the highlights. It was a kind of Romeo and Juliet affair. We demanded that Yunusa Dahiru, the ‘boyfriend’ with whom the girl eloped, should be arrested and prosecuted because the girl is a minor and a Christian. Attempting to marry off the girl without her parent’s permission is not only a breach of common law but also a violation of the Shariah provision on the need for the parents’ approval before nikah can be deemed valid. La nikah bila waliyyin is a basic condition before marriage can be conducted in Islam and Qur’an 4:25 lays emphasis on this same condition. Now, we cannot talk of forceful marriage in this case because both parents of Yunusa, the Shari’ah Council in Kano and even the Emir himself, His Eminence Alhaji Sanusi Lamido Sanusi, refused to conduct the marriage on the basis that the girl is a Christian; she is underage and her parents had not given consent. So there was no marriage.


Where is the forceful marriage they keep talking about? But we in MURIC are displeased with the conduct of our Romeo (Yunusa) for two major reasons: One, he did not listen to his father who warned him not to bring the girl to Kano. Islam frowns heavily on disobedience to parents –Qur’an 17:23; 31:14. Two, contrary to the provisions of Qur’an 17:32 which forbids fornication and adultery, he may have had carnal knowledge of the girl because it is now being rumoured that Juliet (Ese) is five months pregnant. MURIC is not going to say Yunusa is innocent just because he is a Muslim. Islam teaches justice and fairness. The religion or tribe of the parties involved does not matter. The Qur’an commands Muslims to ‘…Stand out firmly for justice, as witnesses of Allah, even if the case is against yourselves, or your parents, or your family, and whether it is against a rich or poor man…’ That is why we called for Yunusa the Romeo’s arrest.


Ijaw youths are not looking at it from an objective angle. They are spoiling for war. All they see is a northerner that abducted their daughter. But is it abduction or elopement? Can we prevent a young boy and a young girl from falling in love with each other? Even Ese’s father has his own faults despite his attempt to blame the Emir of Kano. But the truth is, Ese’s father has a big portion of the blame; same with the mother. How did they train their daughter?


But is the forceful conversion right?


Regarding Ese’s conversion, it is not acceptable to us yet, until the girl is 18. At least, that is what the Nigerian law says and we have to comply since we are Nigerians. The condition for accepting conversion as valid in Islam is different, however. It is buluug, which is maturity that matters. Buluug is measured by the time the girl starts menstruating, which may vary according to her physiological condition.


People are saying the Ese-Yunusa saga has further dented the image of Muslims in the country. Do you agree with that?


That was the aim of the propagators of this story ab initio and I don’t think that aim has changed. Whether they have succeeded or not is another thing anyway. But I think they failed. Yes, they failed woefully.


Besides your organisation, many feel the Muslim community is not bothered about the unfolding event that has Islam at its core. Would you say major Islamic groups, authorities and individuals are complacent about human rights?  


That is not true. Where do you think MURIC gets this deluge of information it uses very often. We network but don’t let us talk about how we do that. Sometimes, other Islamic organisations also rise to the occasion.Exempli gratia, the Nigerian Supreme Council for Islamic Affairs has tackled several issues in the past. Take also the Muslim Students Society of Nigeria; look at the way they handled the issue of the Joint Admission Matriculation Board’s discrimination against candidates who wore hijab in the ongoing JAMB examinations. The National Council of Muslim Youth Organisations and The Companion have equally taken up issues at different periods. But MURIC may be seen as different just because we specialise in human rights, while others handle all aspects of Islamic orientation (evangelisation, education, prayers, enlightenment, etc).


People expect groups like NASFAT, MSSN, NSCIA and others to be involved in this issue. Does it mean they don’t see anything wrong in Yunusa’s actions?  


What is MURIC? Who provides it with information from time to time? Is it not the organisations you mentioned above? MURIC will be nowhere at all if all those organisations withhold information from it. Particularly NSCIA; that is our umbrella organisation and MURIC is tied to its umbilical cord. You will agree with me that the present NSCIA is quite different from what we had before. With the current dynamic and highly mobile, visionary and exemplary leadership, NSCIA is doing quite well and I can tell you that they are involved in this Ese Oruru saga. The fact is that MURIC consults widely on these issues. Sometimes, the organisation is called upon to handle some affairs. So, you must stop imagining that it is MURIC or that it is MURIC alone. MURIC is just an errand organisation and if you send your children to the market and they bring home what you need, you don’t have to embark on the journey to the market by yourself. I hope I have made myself very clear.


Religious crises are not uncommon in the country. Is there a potential for this situation to degenerate into a religious and tribal upheaval?


Yes, it is quite dicey. There are extremists, terrorists and fanatics on both sides of the divide. We need to step up enlightenment about the need for religious tolerance. But above all, we need to leave the Muslims alone. Let the Muslims go. Nigerian Christians should stop measuring Muslims by Christian yardsticks. We have different norms and values. Let us respect one another’s freedom of religion.


Yunusa is seen by many as the culprit in Ese’s predicament. Do you think he acted alone?  


What else are we looking for? We have seen Juliet. We have seen Romeo. Are we still looking for the whole feuding Montague and Capulet families?


Would you prefer Yunusa being tried under Sharia to being tried under the penal or criminal law, having allegedly committed crimes across two states?  


Oh yes, I would love that (to be tried under Sharia law)!


The Emir of Kano has been criticised for his alleged role in the Ese-Yunusa case. Do you think he deserves the criticisms?  


Those who criticise the Emir of Kano on this case are ethnic bigots. They are blinded by their hatred for northerners. What do you want this man to do? He referred the case to the Shariah Council. The latter examined it and decided the girl was too young and she lacked parental support and approval. Pronto, the Emir ordered that the girl be returned to her parents in Bayelsa. What has he done wrong? What many Nigerians don’t know about His Eminence, Sanusi Lamido Sanusi, is that he is wearing two crowns: He is an Emir and a versatile Islamic scholar. This was something I also did not know when he was still serving as the Governor of Central Bank of Nigeria. I came to know later that he speaks Arabic fluently. He is a great asset, a pearl among his peers. You can only hate him out of envy.


Following Ese’s case is a growing number of allegations of other minors being abducted, forced into marriage and converted to Islam. Isn’t this worrisome?  


Which cases? Do you have the proof? Why is the press more interested in investigating Muslims and anti-Muslim whistleblowers? That is my worry. Why is the press silent about hundreds of Muslim children taken to Christian camps from Edo State? Why isn’t the press interested in that? People are free to beat about the bush anyway. They have to justify their pay. The Henry Townsend spirit has to be there too, you know.


What is the Muslim community going to do about these alleged abductions (like the one in Sokoto)?  


There you go again! Baseless, clueless, unfounded and untenable allegations; rumours, rumours and rumours! Where you have cases, bring them forward. You cannot turn us into suspects overnight. You know where abduction is rampant. I won’t mention states. Why is the Nigerian press so keen on causing distractions? A whole region has turned abduction into family and tribal business. The Nigerian press looks the other way and starts prying into issues that have nothing to do with abduction.


Abductions of female children for sex slavery and forced marriage have become a trend in the country. What’s the way out?  


That’s not true. You are making a mountain out of a molehill and I am not under any obligation to answer that kind of question. It is prejudicial. I respect the press and I will continue to cooperate with them but I will not be an accomplice to untruth. Better still, if you must have an answer, the security agencies are the ones who would provide an answer to your question.


Someone like Governor Ayodele Fayose has alleged that President Muhammadu Buhari is trying to Islamise Nigeria. Do you agree with him?  


The fear is unfounded and the comment is most unfair. Unlike Ayo Fayose, Buhari is neither a religious zealot nor an ethnic jingoist. He (Fayose) is the worst governor Nigeria ever had. He is trying to whip up religious sentiment. He wants to start a religious war. People like Fayose cannot hold Nigeria together. I am waiting for the day when he will seek a higher position at the federal level. He holds sectarian and parochial views. He is Islamophobic.   While every patriotic Nigerian is working towards peaceful coexistence, Fayose is actively working towards religious crisis. It is a shame and a negation of everything he stands for as a governor. For seeking to cause religious hullabaloo, Fayose has broken his oath of office.


Recently, President Muhammadu Buhari refused the offer to join the Saudi-led coalition against terror. How do you see that in view of the ongoing insurgency in the North?


The President was right. Why should Nigeria join an all-Muslim military alliance led by anybody? Is this an Islamic country? I told you earlier that Islam teaches justice and equity. We will not support such a coalition just because the President is a Muslim. Our Christian and traditional neighbours have the right to be carried along. Which army is Nigeria going to use if it joins such a coalition? Is it the same Nigerian Army? Is this army made up of Muslims alone?



Islam has no age barrier for marriage — MURIC Director, Akintola

Tuesday, November 25, 2014

Muslims Distance Boko Haram Activities From Islam

The Nigeria Supreme Council for Islamic Affairs (NSCIA) and the Islamic Welfare Foundation have condemned the activities of the Boko Haram sect, maintaining that Islam preaches peace and respect.


Speaking during a conference tagged “Islam and the Nigerian State:A Centenary of Bridging Theocracy and Secularism”, a Professor of Islamic Studies from the National Open University, Professor Ishaq Oloyede noted that both Islam and Christianity have unified different ethnic groups in the country and called for more understanding, tolerance and respect amongst worshipers in the country.


He also blamed lack of unity and fragmentation among Muslims as partly responsible for misinformation on Islam.

The President of Islamic Welfare Foundation, Mallam Aliu Bhadmus, frowned at what he called misinformation and attempt to dub Boko Haram members as Muslims.


He wondered how the group which kills, maims and abduct girls could be labelled Muslims when they indulge in unIslamic acts.


According to him, their actions are more political than religious.


The Vice Chancellor University of Ilorin, Professor Abdulganiyu Ambali also noted that Islam is a religion of peace that lays emphasis on good neighbourliness, insisting that those who practice Islam are forbidden to kill



Viewed 1 times
Muslims Distance Boko Haram Activities From Islam

Saturday, October 4, 2014

Terrorism has no connection with Islam - Jonathan

President Goodluck Jonathan on Saturday in Abuja restated that the activities of terrorist groups across the world had nothing to do with Islam.


President Jonathan meets Nasawawa lawmakers President Jonathan


The president stated this when a delegation of the Muslim community led by Vice President Namadi Sambo paid him Sallah homage at his official residence in the Presidential Villa.


Jonathan maintained that there was nothing Islamic about the atrocities being perpetrated by Boko Haram in Nigeria or Islamic State militants in Iraq who claimed to be fighting for the propagation of Islam.


He said, “What is happening globally now has no religious basis. Only yesterday, a British aid worker was slaughtered by ISIS and that is not Islamic.


“Boko Haram killing innocent children and women in market places, in mosques and schools definitely has nothing to do with religion.”


The president noted that this year’s Sallah celebration was significant, citing certain natural coincidences which, according to him, showed that something good was happening to Nigeria.


He said, “This year is quite significant in terms of celebration of Sallah, because the Day of Arafat coincided with a Friday, and from what I was told it takes a long time to have that coincidence.


“And remembering the fact that 2014 is our centenary year, it shows that something good is happening to this country.


“We may have our challenges as other nations, but when things begin to happen in a particular way, I begin to see light at the end of the tunnel.


“A number of things that have to do with our belief system suppose to encourage us to see our neighbours as ourselves.”


While congratulating Muslims all over the world, the president urged them to use the period to seek God’s mercy for those hiding behind religion to perpetrate evil.


He restated his belief in Nigeria, emphasising that the country had a lot to offer not only to its citizens but also to the entire world.


He said, “Whatever obstacles we see are very ephemeral and part of history of nation building.


“If you read the history of all nations, there is no nation that does not pass through some challenges.


“But, they got over them and moved ahead; I think we are getting over our problems.”


Earlier, the vice president had prayed for peace and unity in the country.


He also prayed that Allah would grant the president the strength, wisdom and good health to lead the country out of its current challenges.


Among the vice president’s entourage were the National Security Adviser, Col. Sambo Dasuki; the Acting Inspector General of Police, Mr Suleiman Abba, and former Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) National Chairman, Bello Haliru.


Others included Primate, Church of Nigeria (Anglican Communion), the Most Rev. Nicholas Okoh; former Speaker of the House of Representatives, Alhaji Ghali Na’Abba, the Deputy Chief Imam of Federal Capital Territory, Sheik Ahmed Onilewura.


The News Agency of Nigeria reports that the Day of Arafat falls on the 2nd day of pilgrimage activities in Saudi Arabia.


On this day, the pilgrims make their way from Mecca to a nearby hillside, Arafat, to pray for peace.



Viewed 1 times
Terrorism has no connection with Islam - Jonathan

Saturday, September 20, 2014

Fighting in the name of Allah

By Muyiwa Adetiba


What image comes to your mind when you hear that a Christian Group is coming to town and what would be your reaction? In all probability, it would be the image of a boring group of Scripture Union adherents in long, loose fitting attires, probably made of dull colours.


Boko Haram in Borno Boko haram in Borno


And if the group is of the Pentecostal bent, in sharp, well cut suits. Either group would wield the Bible like a sword and use honeyed words to pierce our conscience. So the only wound that could be inflicted on us would be spiritual at best. There is no physical harm whatsoever and we can choose to ignore them.


Now, what image comes to your mind these days when you hear that an Islamic group is coming to town? Your mind races ahead to the violence that could be unleashed on the community as you think of an unwieldy group carrying bayonets and cutlasses. You immediately make a mental note to stay at home or if possible, leave town for them because you know the harm that could be done goes beyond the spiritual. You also know you cannot choose to ignore them.


How did it happen that   two dominant religions, both preaching the salvation of souls, both preaching life after death, both preaching the tenets and commandments of one Supreme God, both rooted in the ancient Jewish traditions, and more importantly, both preaching peace, have completely different perception in people’s mind today? How did it happen that the perception that one believes in the use of force and compulsion while the other believes in moral suasion to win converts has now been strongly re-enforced in people’s minds?


Many of us who have Muslims as friends or even benefactors, know that an average Muslim is peace loving. Those of us who grew up and went to school with Muslims know there is really no difference between them and us. They are as good or as bad as the rest of us. But tell that to a man who has never had to live with a Muslim; whose knowledge of Islam is what he sees on TV and reads on the internet. It would seem to him that all the flash points of the world are fuelled and managed by the Islamic faithful.


Boko haram, Al Shabbab, Al Qaeda and now the ISIS are all variants of Islamic terror groups. They have links with each other and compete with each other in brutality and viciousness. Even animals do not kill so wantonly, so needlessly. And they kill, they say, in the name of Allah.


It would be completely misleading and wrong to call these people Muslims just as it would have been wrong to call Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin Christians. Or Chairman Mao a Buddhist. Theirs were twisted minds who managed to find ideological pegs for their atrocities.Unfortunately, unlike Hitler, Stalin or Mussolini who really didn’t hide under Christianity, their modern day clones claim to be fighting for Allah. Allah does not need anybody to fight for Him. The Creator of the universe does not need anybody to avenge for Him. He says clearly ‘Vengeance is mine’. So who are these people fighting for?


It is not a coincidence that they thrive on chaos and in areas where law and order have broken down. That is why you find them in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Sudan, Somalia, Chad and lately,Nigeria.


Their ready made recruits are the disenfranchised, the disgruntled, the aggrieved and the extremely poor.They lure this group, along with another group which comprises the young and the impressionable; those looking for meaning and affection in a seemingly callous and apathetic world, with promises of justice and purity of religion.


They promise opium to hopeless minds and purpose to drifting souls. Many of these recruits are then radicalised to the extent that they genuinely believe that they are fighting for justice and doing Allah’s will who will in turn compensate them with places in His bosom. I don’t however, believe for a second that the leaders from Osama bin Laden to Baghdadi to Shekau believe a word of what they dish out. Their goal is more demonic—the pun is deliberate—and more sinister.


It is to reduce the power and influence of the Western world; to acquire money, influence and power of their own which they can use as bargaining chips.


So it is no surprise that no territory captured by these people practices what they preach. They do not practice or believe in humanity which all great religions espouse.Unfortunately, they find sympathies and funds from some world leaders who have axes to grind with established norms.


As it is in the Arab world, so it is in Nigeria. People who should condemn the evil they represent think they see some phantom good which can be exploited. Many main stream Muslims and free thinkers had supported them in the past because they thought these groups were fighting the excesses of the West especially America.


Now,more and more discerning minds find there is nothing pure or altruistic about these terror groups. In fact, their definition of justice is worse than anything the world has ever seen. The West that is being accused is more accommodating of foreign religions, beliefs and cultures than the accusers.


It is time to realise that these people are worse than Hitler, Stalin, Mao Tse Tsung and Mussolini put together and if allowed, will actually destroy world peace and order. We should stop feeding this monster which camouflages as religion and join hands to exterminate it if we don’t want to lose our common humanity. Worse, a great religion could be stained forever.


 



Viewed 1 times
Fighting in the name of Allah

Saturday, May 10, 2014

Saudi Arabia’s top cleric says Nigeria’s Boko Haram smears Islam

Saudi Arabia’s grand mufti, the top religious authority in the birthplace of Islam, yesterday condemned  Boko Haram as a group “set up to smear the image of Islam” and deplored  its kidnapping of over 200 schoolgirls.


•Boko Haram insurgents

Sheikh Abdulaziz Al al-Sheikh dismissed  the movement, which says it wants to establish a “pure” Islamic state in Nigeria, as “misguided” and should be “shown their wrong path and be made to reject it.”

His remarks came as religious leaders in the Muslim world, who often do not comment on militant violence, joined in denouncing Boko Haram leader Abubakar Shekau for saying Allah had told him to sell off the kidnapped girls as forced brides.


“This is a group that has been set up to smear the image of Islam and must be offered advice, shown their wrong path and be made to reject it,” he told the Arabic-language newspaper al-Hayat in an interview published  yesterday.


“These groups are not on the right path because Islam is against kidnapping, killing and aggression,” he said. “Marrying kidnapped girls is not permitted.”


On Thursday, Islamic scholars and human rights officials of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation, the world’s largest Muslim body representing 57 countries, denounced the kidnapping as “a gross misinterpretation of Islam”.


This week, Al-Azhar, the prestigious Cairo-based seat of Sunni learning, also said that the kidnapping “has nothing to do with the tolerant and noble teachings of Islam.”



Saudi Arabia’s top cleric says Nigeria’s Boko Haram smears Islam