Showing posts with label National conference. Show all posts
Showing posts with label National conference. Show all posts

Friday, September 18, 2015

PDP plans national conference to rebuild party

The national leadership of the Peoples Democratic Party said on Thursday it would reposition the party for future elections.


It therefore said because of this, there was the need for the party to have a national conference where issues bordering on how to reshape the party would be discussed.


Olisah Metuh

Olisah Metuh


The National Publicity Secretary of the party, Chief Olisa Metuh, stated this in Abuja while speaking with journalists on the proposed national conference of the party.


Metuh said a lot of corrections needed to be made due to what he described as the many mistakes of the past.


He added that it was only the PDP members that could contribute to efforts to correct the mistakes of the past.


He was reacting to the crisis generated as a result of the claim by the National Working Committee of the party that it had shifted the proposed national conference of the party scheduled for October.


The proposed conference was being put together by some members of the Board of Trustees of the party, who were backed by both the board and the national caucus of the party.


But because of the alleged fear being nursed by the NWC members that the conference would be used against them, they said the conference must not hold until December.


Metuh, however, said the NWC members were not against the proposed conference, but insisted that all stakeholders of the party would be involved in the conference.


Metuh said, “The NWC, the BoT and even the PDP Governors’ Forum are on the same page on this. We want the national conference and it must hold because we need to know what to do to rebuild the party. If the party had done well, we wouldn’t have lost election and we need this conference to fashion out ways to rebuild it.


“A lot of corrections need to be made due to many mistakes of the past. And it is only party members that will contribute to ensure that that happens. So we need that conference.


“So, we are confirming that that the conference must hold. But we are in need of all the organs, critical stakeholders of the party to participate and make inputs.”


Metuh said that the NWC members had replied to a letter written to it by the leader of the proposed conference, Prof. Jerry Gana, concerning the conference.


He said the former minister of information had, on Wednesday last week, written a letter on behalf of the BoT to the NWC members, informing them about the conference.


He said, “On Wednesday, the NWC received a letter from Prof. Jerry Gana on behalf of the BoT for a proposed conference.


“The NWC however noted that the proposal had members of the committee and everything. So, the NWC now wrote back to Gana, that it will have to study it and communicate in due course.


“Because we felt if we are going to do it, all interests will be accommodated in terms of the leadership of the National Assembly; we will take interest of the PDPGF, we will take nominees from state Houses of Assembly in Nigeria.


“We will take nominees of youth leaders and all the youth forum, because we want the party to go back to the youths now because we want the youths to be involved in whatever we are doing.”


He regretted that there was a communication gap between the NWC and the Gana committee, adding that this could be the reason why the committee proceeded with its preparations for the conference.


Metuh said that the NWC felt that the delay in the holding of the conference was necessary because the Deputy President of the Senate, Ike Ekweremadu, had been given an assignment that he had yet to turn in.


“So, without waiting for that report, and without considering the input of that report, it means that we have discarded and foreclosed the issue of the Ekweremadu Committee,” he added.


Meanwhile, the Ekweremadu-led Post-Election Review Committee of the party has said the committee’s report will be submitted on September 30.


The deputy senate president stated this while interacting with journalists in Abuja on Thursday.



PDP plans national conference to rebuild party

Tuesday, September 15, 2015

Northern leaders rejects Jonathan"s confab report

  • says urge Buhari to convene fresh conference

By Soni Daniel, Northern Region Editor


Prominent Northern leaders, Tuesday, rejected the implementation of the 2014 report of the National Conference convoked by former President Goodluck Jonathan, saying that it did not address the key issues affecting them.


In its place, the northern leaders are asking President Muhammadu Buhari to convene a fresh conference that would take into cognisance the challenges facing them and proffer solutions to them.


The northern leaders who are mostly former political office holders under the aegis of Northern Reawakening Forum (NRF) and headed by a former member of the House of Representatives, Mohammed Kumalia, said it would be wrong for Buhari to implement the report of the conference called by the former leader.


The group, which met in Abuja on Tuesday, issued a strong view on the last conference, and asked for the dumping of the report in the interest of Nigeria.


More details soon



Northern leaders rejects Jonathan"s confab report

Saturday, September 5, 2015

How we warned Tinubu about Buhari - Senator Femi Okurounmu

BY REMI ADEFULU


Senator Femi Okurounmu led the committee that midwifed the 2014 Na­tional Political Conference as chairman of the National Con­ference advisory committee set up by former president Good­luck Jonathan.


Tinubu

Bola Tinubu


In this interview, he as­sessed the Buhari administra­tion and more, declaring that President Buhari is promoting Northern hegemony. Excerpts


What is your assessment of the Buhari administra­tion?


My assessment is that Bu­hari administration is going just the way I expected it to go. It’s doing just the things I expected it to do. It’s only those who are not familiar with Nigerian history and Ni­gerian politics that will be sur­prised about what is going on now. People like me are not surprised, and that was why we warned our people before the elections about the dan­gers of voting for the APC in the presidential election, that in the long run, it is not good for Nigeria, it is not good for our people, so I’m not sur­prised about what is going on.


Clearly, what is going on now shows that Buhari is a presi­dent out on a mission, and the mission is to reinstate Fulani hegemony over the whole of Nigeria. We’ve always said that Buhari is a Fulani irreden­tist. This is not a new posture of his. He has always been so, even in his first coming as Head of State, he behaved the same way. You will remember that when he was fighting cor­ruption as a military Head of State, those who were most persecuted were the UPN gov­ernors, the progressive gover­nors of the UPN, NPP and the GNPP. They were the most persecuted, even though they were the least corrupt. Their administration between 1979 – 1983 were most progressive, they achieved the most for their people, but when he took over power, it was they he per­secuted the most, so this is not new with him. Every time he has the opportunity, is to rein­state Fulani hegemony. That is what he is doing now. Look at the appointments he has made. The first nine appoint­ments he made, only one was from the South, I’m not talking of Yoruba now, I’m talking of the entire South, all the other eight were from the North.


The subsequent 32 appoint­ments, because we’ve been keeping track, only six was from the South, 26 of those 32 were from the North.


There were six appoint­ments he made yesterday (penultimate Thursday), again only one of the six was from the South. How does one jus­tify that in a country where there are so many ethnic na­tionalities and the South and the North are almost about equal? Why will the appoint­ments be so preponderantly favouring the North to the dis­advantage of the South? Even if you are to say its time to pun­ish those who didn’t vote for him, did the Yorubas not vote for him? The Yorubas under the propaganda of Tinubu and his acolytes kept crying this agenda of change, support­ing Buhari, even though we were warning them that the agenda of the APC of North are totally different. The APC of South were making them­selves to believe that there will be change, whereas the APC of the North had only one agenda – to reinstate Northern hegemony, to get power back to the North and get the Fulani back in the control of Nigeria. That was the only agenda they had, nothing else. They only exploited the APC in the South so that they could achieve their aim. One would have expected that Tinubu, with his years in politics should have seen it, but because of his selfish interest, his selfish ambition, he couldn’t. He was been driven by selfish ambi­tion and so he went along and supported the agenda which he knows was not going to be in the interest of his own people. I kept reminding him of Afonja of Ilorin who was betrayed by Alimi. Afonja was betrayed by Alimi even though he was the one that sought the cooperation of Alimi because Afonja was trying to rebel against the Alaafin of Oyo. Afonja achieved his purpose, but after achieving his purpose, what happened to him?


Alimi killed him off and took over and the Fulani established their Emirate in Ilorin, and that was how the Yorubas lost Ilorin forever. Tinubu is the modern day Afonja. I remember I wrote this in several papers because I’m not saying this for the first time. What we had anticipated is what we are seeing now.


Don’t you think it was a grave error that an agreement was not reached on power sharing among


the different blocs in the APC?


Tinubu had his own agenda. The agenda of Tinubu was personal, purely personal, and Tinubu was only using the Yorubas to achieve his personal agenda. Tinubu did not understand the Fulani man. He believed he could use Buhari and that once Buhari is in power, he will effectively be in control. That was why I said he doesn’t understand Nigerian politics.


He should have listened to people with more experience. Money is not all you need to do politics, you also need experience. Tinubu underestimated what Buhari will do when he gets to power. He thought he will be dictating to Buhari. He tried to dictate who will be Senate president, he flopped. He tried who will be Speaker, he flopped. Those controlling Buhari are the northern hegemonies, not the Tinubu party.


What is your take on Buhari’s anti- corruption campaign?


The anti-corruption campaign so far, I think it just mere propaganda. I say that for several reasons. One: as a president seriously interested in fighting corruption, you must try to wage a war that must be effective. If you want to try people for corruption, you try them in court, whether they are special courts or regular course. It is the judges who will try these cases, how innocent are our judges of corruption?


There have been so many studies done saying the judiciary is the most corrupt institution in Nigeria. In 1994, there was a committee under the late Justice Kayode Esho that investigated  the judiciary which strongly indicted our judiciary, which led to the retirement of so many judges. In 2002, there was another one under Justice Babalakin, which strongly indicted the judiciary. Since then, the judiciary has become even worse, to extent that judges openly lobby to be appointed to election tribunals because elections tribunals have become where people just take money and get judgment. Election tribunals are just cash and carry affairs.


A lot of attempt to fight corruption has been stalled by the judiciary. Between 1999 and 2007, there were several cases of investigations, but they couldn’t prosecute them. Most of the cases in court against these former governors have been stalled by judges. More than 12 cases of governors who have been indicted between 1999 and 2007 are still lingering in the courts because the judges will not give ruling. The first step is to clean the judiciary. The judiciary is filled with corrupt people, and you cannot be passing judgment on corrupt people if you are corrupt. Secondly to fight corruption, we must go back to when corruption became a serious cancer on Nigeria. A lot of people have diagnosed this to mean the Babangida era. It was during Babangida‘s era that corruption became institutionalized.


It became a fad because everybody was doing so, and nobody was punished. It has to go back to the Babangida era which led to the Abacha era. All of us know the extent of corruption under Abacha. Although Abacha is dead, a lot of those who worked with him are still alive. A lot of money stolen under


Abacha are still abroad. The agencies fighting corruption are also very corrupt.


We must go back to Babangida, Abacha, Abubakar administrations and also Obasanjo when we had the 16 billion dollars power contract scam. Nothing was done. After all the noise and fury, it all died down. Nobody was prosecuted, nobody was punished.


Why then is the Jonathan administration being singled out for probe?


Because his mission is to fight Jonathan. Look at a person like Obasanjo in alliance with Tinubu, in alliance with Buhari. Their mission is to fight PDP and Jonathan. If you want to fight PDP, PDP didn’t start with Jonathan.


You have to look at what the PDP did between 1999 and 2007. It was then Obasanjo used the EFCC as a witch hunt instrument against his opponents, and those who were loyal to him could get away with anything. In fact, it was because Obasanjo’s regime was so corrupt, that it became difficult for Yar’Adua to fight corruption. Of course, Jonathan is an extension of Yar’Adua who did not want to become president. He was not interested. The people interested were people like Ibori, Odili and so on. What Obasanjo did was to show them their files, which had been compiled by Ribadu about the extent of their corruption, and threatened them with prosecution.


He said if they did not want to be prosecuted, they should drop their ambition and go and fund Yar’Adua. He made these people to fund Yar’Adua’s election and Jonathan. When Yar’Adua got there, knowing who funded his, campaign, how could he go after these men? Obasanjo made it impossible for Yar’Adua to fight corruption and it now turned to a situation where when Yar’Adua got to power, those who were always hanging out with him were the Iboris and the corrupt clique within the Obasanjo administration. If you are going to fight corruption, these are the people you have to go after. Nigeria should have seen that Yar’Adua’s not fighting corruption was due to the way Obasanjo imposed him and made corrupt people to fund his campaign.


Don’t you think the Buhari’s emergence is similar since his election had to be sponsored by politicians?


In fact, look at the leader of the APC, Nuhu Ribadu when he was still active as the EFCC Chairman in 2010, appeared before the National Assembly during plenary to give them a list of governors that had been indicted. He made a special reference to Tinubu that his own was of international dimension. So, if you are going to start fighting corruption,


certainly, you cannot leave Tinubu out. Ribadu has the files on a lot the governors in APC. If you say the PDP was corrupt, how come its leaders came from PDP? If they were corrupt in PDP, did they become saints an soon as they joined APC? They were all in the same camp with Jonathan but because of their Northern agenda, they crossed over to the APC. A lot of people in APC today will have to lose their shirts if Buhari is going to really fight corruption. Amaechi and Tinubu should be some of the first to be probed and jailed.


But we learnt there is no documented evidence to probe Tinubu


That was not Nuhu Ribadu’s EFCC.


The EFCC as I’ve said is also corrupt.


Let them call Ribadu and ask him.


Even all of us in Lagos State know the extent of Tinubu’s corruption. We knew what Tinubu was worth in 1999.


Today, he has three private jets. We can even start by asking him the source of the funds for those private jets. He has almost acquired the whole of Lagos


How was he able to acquire all those properties without any trace of corruption?


These are questions, that must be asked. Tinubu could have been jailed in 1999. All the schools he claimed to have attended in his INEC form were fake. He was guilty of all those things Gani Fawehinmi alleged.


You belong to the Afenifere which backed Tinubu for governor; don’t you think you should share part of the blame?


Afenifere supported him to be governor.


Afenifere people are not all saints.


Tinubu turned out to have been the black sheep within the Afenifere. No sooner had Tinubu become governor than he turned against Afenifere. He turned against Baba Adesanya, He turned against Adebanjo. He turned against the whole organization, and he led a rebellion of his fellow governors, because they now had money, and you know in Nigeria, everybody follows whoever has money. Tinubu betrayed Afenifere. He was a rebellious Afenifere man. All the problems in Yoruba land


today was due to Tinubu’s rebellion.


That was what split the unity of Yoruba land that has continued till today.


You midwifed the national conference, can you tell us your experience?


My experience is that naturally; those


who benefit from the status quo would not want a change. The reason many of us have been crying over the years,


including Tinubu was to stop Northern hegemony, the idea of first class citizenship and second class citizenship, where some people would think they are born to rule and others are born to serve. Everybody was feeling that this was inequitable. Not only that. A lot of power was concentrated in the Federal Government. So whoever controls the Federal Government more or less has a strangle hold on everybody else in the society, and that is why the competition for president, was always so severe, and that was why the North always wanted to hold on to the presidency.


So, these are some of the reasons for asking for a national conference to restructure, to decentralize, so that all powers does not reside in the center.


A lot of the power can be devolved on the federating units so that the struggle for the centre will become less severe, less cantankerous, and the idea of born to rule will be removed, so that all of us can have a sense of eq­uity, sense of justice.


These are some of the rea­sons why many of us have been advocating for a national conference. In fact, all of us in Yoruba land, including Tinubu were advocating for it, but when Tinubu saw that there is a personal advantage for him to back the Hausa/Fulani people, who did not want a na­tional conference, all of a sud­den the national conference was not necessary. That it was a diversion. He was speaking on his own immediate advan­tage, thinking that if they get to power, he will become very powerful. Because of this, he changed his course, turning around to oppose the confer­ence.


He was only aligning himself with the North because the North have always been the ones opposing the conference. If you look at the constitution we operate today, it is a con­stitution tailor – made to pro­mote Northern hegemony, to make the North dominate the rest of us. Starting from when Gowon had 12 states, six in North, six in the South and Awolowo was his lieutenant. There was justice.


There was every reason to create those 12 states so that they could get the support of the minorities for the war ef­fort. It was done in a fair and equitable manner, but as soon as the military hegemonies took over, they began to de­stroy things until finally, they started creating local govern­ments and today, the North has 200 local governments more than the South, and those lo­cal governments became a basis for revenue sharing and representation in parliament.


Even in terms of 19 and 17 states, they have an advantage because each state has the same number of senators, and when you get to the House of Representatives, they have bigger advantage because Kano State alone has repre­sentatives than three states combined. The constitution was tailor–made to favour the North. That is why the North has never supported any na­tional conference.


That was why when Jona­than finally agreed to have a national conference, the North opposed it. That was surpris­ing. What was the national conference. It was a betrayal, a betrayal of the Yoruba peo­ple.


Don’t you think the con­ference timing was rather late?


You know we have been fighting for something for more than 30 years. There have been several presidents before Jon­athan. We made presentations to them, they did not listen, in­cluding Obasanjo. Finally we found a president who finally agreed to carry it out. You can­not say because of the timing, therefore it’s wrong. If that is what we want, any timing is good timing, provided we will solve Nigeria’s problem once and for all. If we solve the problems, generations will still be having elections and those elections will be on the basis of equality. Before Jona­than, we made presentations to them, they did not listen. Finally, we found a president who listened and who finally agreed to carry it out.


You cannot say because of the timing, therefore, it’s wrong. If that is what we want, any timing is timing, provided we will solve Nigeria’s prob­lem once and for all. If we solve the problem, generations will still be having elections and those elections will be the basis of equity and justice for all Nigerians. If we don’t solve that problem we have now, we will have to conduct elections without carrying out the rec­ommendations of the confer­ence.


Now we are back to square one in the terms of ethnic domination, back to the prob­lem of suspicions among one another. These are the things that create instability. It is not only Boko Haram that can cre­ate instability. Once other sec­tions of the country feel they are being oppressed, they are marginalised, they too will be­gin to organise mini rebellion. The instability will multiply around the country. Instead of us solving the causes of in­stability once and for all, we are engaging in the causes of instability. That is what is hap­pening.


How were you able to face criticisms, especially from the northern axis while car­rying out your assignment?


Well, I’m not new in politics. I worked with Awolowo. I cut my political teeth under Chief Obafemi Awolowo. As soon I took up the assignment, I already knew what the posi­tion of the North would be, what their stand would be, so I was prepared, fully prepared. Fortunately, we already had some kind of accommodation between the South-east and South-south. We were already meeting under the umbrella of the Southern Nigeria Peoples Assembly.


The Southern Nigeria Peo­ples Assembly visited Jona­than several times on the issue of the national conference be­fore he finally gave in. Because we had this meeting point, we were not as divided as in previ­ous conferences. We were able to adopt some common points of view for the South, just the same way the North is always together. Not only was the South together, we were able to get some elements within the Biddle-Belt. The Middle- Belt are the most persecuted people in this country. They are in the North, but they are being persecuted by the Fulani people of the North.


Their own persecution is worse than that of us in the South. They cannot complain. If they do, they get persecuted even more. It’s like a slave complaining against his mas­ter. Because of that they sup­ported us in the South, and be­cause of that alliance between the South and middle-belt, we were able to get most of the recommendations that will be for the better governance of this country, recommendation, that will devolve power, en­sure equity, that will decentral­ize the Federal government; that will foster equity; that will foster justice, and give more power to the states. All these we were able to do at the na­tional conference, but the North was opposed to them. The North wanted the confer­ence to collapse because they couldn’t have their way, still we did not allow them to. That made them more determined that power must return to the North.


With all these strides, how did you feel when President Buhari said he would not implement the outcome of the national conference?


As I have said, I knew from the word go, that if he wins, he will not implement it. That was why towards the elections we organized a strong campaign that Jonathan is only the can­didate of all the candidates who will implement the reso­lutions of the national confer­ence. (Gov) Mimiko led that campaign and we all rallied round him.


We held several meetings around Yoruba land, to let our people know that because we have been the ones champion­ing this national conference, we finally got a president who listened to us, we had the con­ference, it was very success­ful, we have achieved most of our objectives, if we vote for Buhari, we are going to throw away all that we have achieved, whereas if we vote for Jonathan, he has commit­ted himself to implement these resolutions.


Of course, the people are always right, our people de­cided they will vote for Buhari because of the Tinubu pro­paganda machinery, because of the money. Unfortunately, people cannot distinguish be­tween news and propaganda. Tinubu is able to control the media network throughout the country. Almost every news­paper editor is in his pocket. He dishes out what he wants people to hear, and everybody who reads them thinks this in the news. Everybody was carried away by the change mantra, and we all voted for Buhari, so this is where it has got us.


What are the lessons from all these?


The lesson is that people must always know their his­tory. Today, a lot of those in school don’t even know what happened twenty years ago, and there is no nation where people don’t know their histo­ry and make progress. In every Jewish school, they are taught the history of second world war, how Jewish people swere persecuted in Europe, how six million Jews were killed. Ev­ery Jewish boy knows that. If you go to America today, and you want to become an Ameri­can citizen, they will give you an exam. If you don’t pass it, they won’t give you citizen­ship.


When you talk of Buhari’s record as Head of State, how many voters were mature then to know what happened, so it’s easy to deceive people. That is the problem. Our people don’t know history


Any regrets about the na­tional conference?


No regrets at all because the report is there. We have made the effort. There is a saying that once you try, you try and try again.


We shall keep making the efforts until we die, but if we die, subsequent generations will take up the struggle. The struggle must continue until we achieve a Nigeria where ev­erybody feels there is no ruler, there is no servant, and of us are equal citizens. That must be the ultimate goal. I have no regrets at all.



How we warned Tinubu about Buhari - Senator Femi Okurounmu

Tuesday, July 21, 2015

Buhari dumps National Conference report - Source reveals

President Muhammadu Buhari will not implement the report of the 2014 National Conference convened by former President Goodluck Jonathan, The PUNCH has learnt.


Jonathan and Buhari

Jonathan and Buhari


A top government official confided in our correspondent on Tuesday that Buhari was not favourably disposed to the implementation of the report despite the fact that Jonathan handed over the document to him alongside his (Jonathan’s) handover note.


Jonathan had, during his handover ceremony on May 28, told Buhari that the confab report was more important than his handover note.


Shortly before he left office, the former President had forwarded the report to the National Assembly for action.


But the Presidency source told one of our correspondents that Buhari would not implement it because he never believed in the conference.


Rather, he said the President would stick to the recommendations of his transition committee led by Ahmed Joda.


The source also recalled that the ruling All Progressives Congress which was in opposition during Jonathan’s administration did not take part in the conference despite the fact that its leadership was formally asked to send representatives.


He said, “President Buhari never believed in the National Conference. His position is not different from that of his party, the APC, which snubbed the invitation to send representatives to the confab.


“The conference and its report are Jonathan’s babies and you won’t expect this administration to implement the report, especially in this era that all we have been doing is to try and clear the rot left behind by the same administration.


“The President had not even at any time made any reference to the report. It is not on his agenda.”


Jonathan, had during his different meetings with traditional rulers from the South-West ahead of the March 28 presidential election, promised to ensure the implementation of the conference’s report if re-elected.


He had argued that since the APC refused to take part in the conference, a government formed by the party would not implement the report.


Apparently confirming Jonathan’s position, Buhari had also at a time taken a swipe at the Federal Government over the conference, saying that billions of naira was spent on it.


The Federal Executive Council led by Jonathan had on March 18 approved the report of the conference led by Justice Idris Kutigi.


The then Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Senator Pius Anyim, had told reporters that the approval was the first leg of the steps aimed at implementing the conference report.


Anyim had said recommendations and resolutions that require constitutional amendment and enactment of new laws would be forwarded to the National Assembly.


He added that agencies’ policy matters in the report shall be referred to the affected agencies and the tier of government concerned – whether federal, state or local governments, for action.


Anyim said while the process leading to the implementation of the report might not end during the Jonathan administration’s tenure, a bold step forward had been taken with the approval.


The National Conference recommended that anybody aspiring to become the country’s President must be a degree holder, among other recommendations.


When contacted, Buhari’s spokesperson, Mr. Femi Adesina, said he has no information on the matter.


He said, ‘‘The President will do what is in the best interest of Nigerians.’’


The National Publicity Secretary of the All Progressives Congress, Alhaji Lai Mohammed, said, “Like I said before, we will look at the document and any area that is beneficial to Nigeria and Nigerians will be considered.”


But some delegates to the 2014 National Conference have called on Buhari not to dump the report of the confab and its recommendations.


A delegate, who is the Ondo State Commissioner for Environment, Mr. Sola Ebiseni, and the National Publicity Secretary of a pan-Yoruba group, Afenifere, Mr. Yinka Odumakin, who represented the South- West, argued that restructuring was imperative.



Buhari dumps National Conference report - Source reveals

Tuesday, April 21, 2015

Buhari shouldn’t ignore confab recommendations - Uranta

Mr. Tony Uranta is Executive Secretary, Nigeria National Summit Group, NNSG and a former member of the National Dialogue Committee. Uranta, in this interview states why the Presidemt-elect, Maj-General Muhammudu Buhari (retd) should not discard the reports of the National Conference arguing that it would assist the new administration restructure the nation. Excerpts:


What are the expectations of Nigerians from the President-elect as he takes over by May 29?


I think it will be proper to begin by congratulating General Buhari for having true persistence and doggedness because I am still astonished at a general of his age repeatedly contesting for that office and not being deterred by the fact that he was losing consistently.


We expect him, most of all, to focus on the restructuring of Nigeria. You will remember that the  Yoruba’s Afenifere and a great deal of people supported President Jonathan not because they liked his face, not because they necessarily liked his politics, but because they like the fact that he committed to restructuring this nation as it is needed and necessary if it is to sustainably continue as a united, progressive Nigeria.


Biggest platform


One of the biggest platforms on which he now created this ethos of restructuring is the platform of the National Conference.


Many of us, who were supportive of the National Conference and its recommendations, have been calling for the implementation of the recommendations of the Conference. If all that General Buhari does is to implement the National Conference’s recommendations, the President-elect would be a hero. But, he has already begun to win my heart by announcing that he will not nominate or appoint anybody into public office who has not sworn to declare his assets in Court, not just to the Code of Conduct Bureau. Let me sidetrack and repeat, I am not a member of any party. I was, and I am, a friend and supporter of President Goodluck Ebele Jonathan. But I am primarily a citizen of this nation that wants Nigeria to improve, and I have the pedigree to prove this beyond any reasonable doubt. even before he began.


Of course, very importantly, we will expect that General Buhari does one thing that everybody is expecting him to do as soon he assumes office; he must end the terrorism and insurgency in the North East as soon as possible because that was the key promise of his campaign-”we will stop Boko Haram, we know how to stop Boko Haram and we know who Boko Haram is”. Yes, that is his pledge.


And, truly, since, we must admit, they have not attacked us so much since he won the election, I want to assume that once he ascends into power, Boko Haram will formally sign-out. But in reality, we know that BokoHaram has formally aligned itself with its cousins ISIS, we know that the Al-Shabab is increasing operations in East Africa, AQIM is expanding through North-Western Africa further south into Mali etc, Yemen is burning, Syria is exploding, so whether Boko Haram is going to die that kind of a natural death remains to be seen.


But, having had the opportunity to work with him politically in the past, I want to believe the General is man of his word. If he does not put Boko Haram out of business within the first 90 days of his being in office, Nigerians would be able to say to him very openly and frankly, “General, you lied to us”, because he repeatedly assured us he would make Boko Haram stop immediately he becomes President.


I want to think, because he was chosen by Boko Haram as their public representative, he had already spoken with them and they had acceded, but, whichever which way, all we are saying, Mr. President-Elect, is ‘Stop Boko Haram’.


These are the imperative things General Buhari must do for us  within the first 100 days, to get us to welcome him and say that truly Jega’s Nigerians did not make a mistake; then we all will applaud him and say, “we chose a better leader by bringing in Buhari”. However, if Buhari does not do those key things, I do not know how today’s NIgerians and posterity will judge him.


Do you think the South-East and South-South miscalculated in the last election?


I think anybody who thinks that the voting patterns would influence the composition of government as to ethnic or religious biases, does not understand what modern nationhood is all about. General Buhari or any leader at the national or state levels cannot but be seen to fully carry along every member of their relevant electorate’s demographics (be they women, youth, elderly, disadvantaged physically, religios, ethnic ) if they wish this nation well.


They cannot say, for example, I am going to restrict governance to members of my party. General Buhari cannot for example say, I wont have Igbo in my cabinet, he cannot say, I will punish the South-East and the South-South for not voting for me or against me. If he does that, he would have fully played into the hands of his detractors. If he does that he would have laid the foundation for the crumbling of Nigerian unity, peace and progress within less than six months of his coming to power.


Whether we like it or not, there are indigenous people and settlers in every part of Nigeria but we must not encourage this indigene and non-indigene dichotomy to keep on negatively building up in this country.


Silly partisan thoughtlessness


We are looking for how we can unite Nigeria, not further divide it over silly partisan thoughtlessness and insensitivities. Every incoming government has to look at the demographics of its state or the nation snd include every member-group in its workings as much as is feasible. For example, I am not happy that Lagos had only Ben Akabueze as Commissioner.


There is no Ijaw man or woman. Do you know what the Ijaw vote does in Lagos? All these must be taken into consideration in tomorrow’s Nigeria, this New Nigeria that we are beginning to see being birthed before our eyes.


 



Buhari shouldn’t ignore confab recommendations - Uranta

Thursday, March 26, 2015

APC, National Conference And The Nigerian State; Is GMB a Man of Integrity?

  • Is GMB a Man of Integrity

  • Ability to Defeat Insurgency

  • How Competent Had Buhari Been?

  • Commitment to Fight Corruption

  • Amnesty for Treasury Looters

National Conference


The APC does not support the National Conference [NC] though the recommendations made by the NC will help to move the country forward if implemented. Some of the recommendations of the NC are the creation of states mostly for minorities, partial resource control, state police, state constitution, freedom of every state to explore and exploit its natural resources and develop at its own pace. No Hausa Fulani [HF} politician will support the restructuring of the country as envisaged by the NC because they are the ones who benefit from the type of federalism we have in Nigeria today. Consequently, every non-HF Nigerian who wants changes that will move Nigeria in the right direction and free him/her and future generations from HF hegemony and exploitation must cast his/her vote for the party and individuals that will support full implementation of the NC report.


National Conference

National Conference


In his New Year Message, the self-styled national leader of the APC, Senator Tinubu said that ‘the ever widening inequality between the wealthy minority and the impoverished majority is fueled largely by a scale of corruption and outright theft of public funds that have reached unprecedented heights in today’s Nigeria’. In his capacity as the presidential candidate of the APC, GMB is the cardinal ‘Change Agent’ of the APC. His personality will determine whether or not the party fulfills its electoral promises if elected into power, hence the need to x-ray his antecedents.


Commitment to Fight Corruption


Missing $2.8 Billion US Dollars. When he was the Federal Commissioner for Petroleum and Natural Resources in 1977, the sum of $2.8 Billion US Dollars was reported missing from the NNPC’s accounts in Midland Bank in London. In an interview he granted to Mrs Vera Ifudu, a staff of the NTA, Senator O. Saraki claimed in 1984 that a Senate Sub Committee chaired by him during Shagari’s administration traced the missing money to GMB’s accounts in the same Bank in London. Instead of using this opportunity to demonstrate his commitment to fight corruption by constituting a Commission of Inquiry to investigate the allegation and make its findings public, he orchestrated her dismissal from the NTA. He then promulgated Decree No: 4 which he used to stop Nigerians from demanding answers from him as regards the missing $2.8 billion US Dollars. Meanwhile, he was busy jailing politicians, mostly from southern Nigeria on trumped-up charges of corruption.


N25,758,448.00 Stolen in PTF. According to the report of the Interim Management Committee chaired by Dr Haruna Adamu which probed the PTF, under GMB’s watch as the Executive Chairman of the PTF, the sum of twenty five billion, seven hundred and fifty eight million, four hundred and forty eight naira [N25,758,448.00] was stolen out of one hundred and eighty one billion, seven hundred and ninety five million naira [N181,795,000,000.00] only that accrued to PTF from 1996 – 1999. Though he did not steal the money, he was found to have created the conducive environment for his in-law, Alhaji Salihijo to steal it.


Amnesty for Treasury Looters. According to documentaries aired by the AIT, Senator Tinubu is amongst the most corrupt human beings on the planet earth. Instead of responding to these weighty allegations by telling the nation his own side of the story, Tinubu ran to court and secured a court injunction banning AIT from airing one of the documentaries  until the determination of the suit he files against the AIT. It is a fact that GMB’s presidential campaigns are funded by Senator Tinubu and other alleged treasury looters in the APC. Since he will not be able to prosecute his corrupt party members, GMB has since granted unconditional amnesty to all treasury looters in Nigeria if he wins the presidential election. According to GMB’s policy on corruption, all cases of corruption that took place before 29 May 2015 will be swept under the carpet if the APC wins the presidential election.


Challenge from IBB. When GMB accused IBB of destroying the oil industry when he was in power, IBB threatened to expose his shady practices while in office as TPF Executive Chairman and Federal Commissioner of Petroleum and Natural Resources. He said ‘We are conversant with Buhari’s so called holier-than-thou attitude. He is a one time Minister of Petroleum we have good records of his tenure as a Minister. Secondly, he also presided over PTF which records we also have. ……… Those who live in glass houses do not throw stones. General Buhari should be properly guided’. If GMB is not corrupt, why has he not taken up this challenge from IBB or is he really living in a glass house?


Is GMB a Man of Integrity?


Buhari and Certificate

Buhari and Certificate


Certificate Scandal. According to available documents, he was commissioned into the Nigerian Army without the required academic qualifications. He is now contesting in the presidential election without the required academic qualification. If he wins the presidential election, Nigeria will enter the Guinness Book of Records as the only country in 21st Century with a semi- illiterate as her president. Whether GMB is educated up to or above the required academic qualification is inconsequential until he produces his WASC or its equivalent. As long as he cannot present the academic qualification he used to secure commission into the military, his elevation in the military to the rank of Major General was fraudulent because he should not have been commissioned into the Nigerian Army in the first place. It is despicable and arrant nonsense for anyone with such a fraudulent academic record to be considered as a man of integrity.


Broken Promise. In 2011, he promised never to contest for the office of the president of Nigeria again and sealed it with his tears before the whole world, but he had since broken that promise. He said Mallam El Rufai persuaded him to change his mind. From every indication, more of such broken promises will become a norm if he is saddled with the affairs of this great nation.


Partnering with Treasury Looters. The only difference between the APC and the PDP is the names of the political parties because both parties are peopled by very corrupt politicians. These corrupt politicians in the APC are the ones who sponsor GMB’s presidential campaigns and if he wins, these same looters are the people he will use to implement his government policies. Imagine what will happen if a serial rapist is given the task of escorting a girl to the forest to gather firewood. Secondly, how effective do you think any police officer will be if most of his friends are men and women of questionable characters?


Ability to Defeat Insurgency


The on going military operations against the Boko Haram terrorists have dealt a serious blow on one of the pillars the APC had been using to win public support. If the present tempo is sustained, the menace of Boko Haram terrorists will be history in no distant future.


How Competent Had He Been


Dereliction of Duty as Head of State. He became the Head of State and C-in-C of Nigerian Armed Forces at a tender age of 41 but the real executive powers of that office were exercised by Chief of Staff, Supreme Headquarters, Brigadier General Idiagbon [rtd] and he could not exercise effective control over his subordinates. Brigadier General Idiagbon [rtd] went to Mecca on a Lesser Hajj with his under aged son in violation of GMB’s government policy but he was not sanctioned by the Head of State. His ADC, Major Jokolo [rtd] cleared 53 suit cases his father, Emir of Gwandu, brought into the country from Saudi Arabia in violation of existing government policy but the ADC was not sanctioned also.


Failure to Stop IBB’s Coup. Having been briefed by Security Agencies of IBB’s plan to topple him, he invited IBB to his office for interview on the allegation. Though IBB confirmed existence of the coup plan, GMB could not take appropriate measures expected of a military C-in-C, however faint-hearted, to counter the coup plan. All GMB could do was to tell IBB ‘well if anybody wants to sit on this seat, he can go ahead’ and today, the rest is history.


Dereliction of Duty as PTF Executive Chairman. When he was appointed the Executive Chairman of PTF at the age of 54, he relinquished his executive powers to his brother in-law, Alhaji Salihijo. Alhaji Salihijo was the Executive Director of Afri-Project Consortium which he contracted as the Management Consultants and Projects Consultants for the PTF. Under this arrangement, the Afri-Project Consortium assumed all powers to initiate, approve and execute all PTF projects. Consequently, his only duty as the Executive Chairman of PTF was to sign any cheque presented to him by his brother in-law, Alhaji Salihijo. As expected, the result of this dereliction of duty by GMB was massive looting of public funds by his brother in-law, Alhaji Salihijo.


 Dereliction of Duty as National Leader of CPC. When he formed the CPC to contest the 2011 presidential election at the age of 69, he could not exercise effective control over the party. He was only interested in securing the presidential candidate slot for himself. Due to conflicting interests amongst the party members at the national headquarters and absence of policy direction from him, the CPC could not present a united front during the elections. This led to the abysmal performance of the party even in the core north in 2011.


Can He Tolerate Press Freedom


The Abuja Peace Accord. Under the current dispensation, things are so rosy that we take press freedom for granted. Today in Nigeria, anyone can abuse the president to high heavens and everyone is free to say or publish whatever he/she likes against the Federal Government. As at the time of producing this article, there is no political prisoner or exile in Nigeria. Can GMB tolerate even one percent of insults Nigerians shower on President Jonathan daily, especially in social media? While in London to present his manifestoes to the British people in Chatham House last month, GMB threatened to pull out of the Abuja Peace Accord because Nigerians asked him to present his academic qualifications as required by the Electoral Act 2010[As Amended].


Decree No: 4. He promulgated Decree No: 4 of 1984 specifically to protect himself from accusations bordering on the $2.8 billion US Dollars which was reported missing from the NNPC accounts at Midland Bank, London when he was the Federal Commissioner for Petroleum and Natural Resources at the age of 34. Under the Decree, whoever published or said anything which his military government did not like was guilty of the provisions of the Decree. As expected, he bluntly turned down a passionate request to apologize to those Nigerians whom he caged and terrorized with this obnoxious Decree.


His Past Economic Policy


Trade by Barter. The primary focus of his economic policy was anchored on trade by barter and drastic reduction in importation of what he called ‘non essential commodities’. The ‘essential commodities’ that were brought into the country during his regime were exchanged with the Nigerian crude oil. This pre-historic form of economic policy led to unprecedented shortage of commodities and collapse of businesses with attendant negative consequences. As if these were not enough, he dismissed over 200,000 civil servants from work nationwide. Due to persistent shortage of essential commodities, Nigerians had to form long cues everyday to buy simple things like toilet soap, toilet paper, salt, groundnut oil amongst others.


Lagos Metro Line Project. He cancelled the metro line project which would have comprehensively solved the prevailing traffic problems in Lagos state. He said he canceled the project because he did not want to borrow money to complete it. However, his government later paid a fine for breach of contract in US Dollars to the French Firm which Lagos State contracted to execute the project.


Arrested Development. He is the only retired General in Nigeria that does not have even a pure water business to his name. If he could secure N27.5 million naira without a collateral to buy the APC nomination Forms, it is possible for him to procure loans from the Banks to invest in Businesses if had wanted. Why is it that GMB did not engage in any form of economic activity to create wealth and alleviate poverty like the rest retired senior military officers? Apart from granting endless interviews to Kaduna Radio, BBC and VOA Hausa Services, he has done nothing to improve himself economically and academically for the past 31 years. In view of this appalling reality, his capacity to successfully manage the largest economy in Africa in this digital age is doubtful?


Islamisation of Nigeria


Boko Haram Terrorists. He had been very critical of Federal Government on many occasions because of Boko Haram terrorists. He said that he considered any attack on Boko Haram terrorists as an attack on the north and called on Federal government to stop killing northerners [Boko Haram terrorists] and destroying their homes. He added that Boko Haram terrorists were also fighting for their rights, hence they should be granted amnesty unconditionally. He strongly opposed the imposition of emergency rule in the three north eastern states ravaged by the terrorists. Very few Nigerians were therefore surprised when he was nominated by the Boko Haram terrorists to lead their delegation to talks with the Federal Government.


Promotion of Sharia Laws.  At a seminar organized by the Supreme Council for Sharia in Nigeria in Kaduna in 2001 he promised to do every thing within his power to spread Sharia Laws in Nigeria. He is the only prominent HF politician in Nigeria who openly supported Governor Yerima’s hypocritical act of amputating a Muslim’s hand for stealing. He went further to warn non-Muslims to mind their business because, according to him, there is nothing wrong when Muslims cut off Muslims’ limbs in strict compliance with Sharia Laws. He is on record to have warned Muslims to vote only for Muslims who will promote Islamic religion.


Divisive Campaigns. The Governor of Jigawa State, Alhaji Lamido accused him of engaging in divisive campaigns in northern and southern parts of the country. He said that when GMB addresses supporters in the north he usually plays the religious card but when he addresses electorate in the south, he preaches national unity. He demanded to know why some people are vilified and maligned because they refuse to vote for him [GMB] as their president and have opted for a Christian? He then wondered why GMB should chose a Christian as his running mate and shunned the Muslim community, then turns round to tell the people in the north that his contest is anchored on promoting and guiding their ideological faith?


May Allah/God grant us the grace to see with our eyes but not with our minds so that we will not sentence ourselves and generations yet unborn to servitude with our votes.


Dr Deborah Nelson


Ilorin, Kwara State



APC, National Conference And The Nigerian State; Is GMB a Man of Integrity?

Friday, March 6, 2015

APC will Dump National Conference Report, Says PDP Group

1

Ahead of the March 28 presidential election, a group operating under the aegis of the PDP Integrity Vanguard on Thursday expressed fears that the All Progressives Congress (APC) would not implement the recommendations of the 2014 National Conference if the party wins the presidential election.


National ConferenceAddressing a press conference in Abuja, members of the group, some of whom were delegates to the conference, said the APC was strongly opposed to the convocation of the National Conference and refused to participate in it.


According to Senator Aniete Okon, who read the statement on behalf of members of the Integrity Vanguard, the APC governors were compelled to send delegates to the conference as a result of the pressure from their people who were keen on participating in the national dialogue.


He emphasised that there was clear contradiction in the policy position of the APC on the National Conference where its governors were not on the same page with the leadership of the party on the issue.


“The leadership of the APC did not hide its disdain for Nigeria and its people when they refused to participate in the conference.


“It is worthy to note that the APC-led state governments sent very robust representations in response to the vociferous enthusiasm, yearnings and demands of their people.


“This was clear contradiction of the policy position of the APC and which demonstrates and underscores the fact that APC is anti-people and anti the Nigerian state.


“It is therefore obvious that the APC is bent on frustrating, undermining and subverting the wishes of Nigerians and the one subject on which the entire country is united – the implementation of the resolution of the resolutions and realisation of the goals of the 2014 National Conference.


The PDP Integrity Vanguard applauded the people of the South-west geopolitical zone for endorsing President Goodluck Jonathan to enable him implement the recommendations of the National Conference during his second tenure.


“We wish to put on record that President Jonathan has spoken unequivocally, reiterating his commitment to the full implementation of the recommendations of the National Conference if re-elected into office on March 28, 2014.


“It is based on this commitment that the leadership of the South-west has also unanimously endorsed the re-election of President Jonathan. We salute their courage and foresight, and we congratulate them.


“The PDP Integrity Vanguard supports completely the position of the South West with regards to the implementation of these resolutions. We call on all Nigerians irrespective of class, creed and affiliations to support the emergence of a new, more equitable and egalitarian Nigeria.


“PDP is the political party that is visibly and unswervingly committed to the restructuring of Nigeria for the common good of all its citizens. We urge all Nigerians to vote for President Jonathan and PDP to enable the implementation of the one document that represents our collective aspirations.”



Viewed 1 times
APC will Dump National Conference Report, Says PDP Group

Wednesday, October 1, 2014

Lawmakers to vote on Confab report

The House of Representatives has announced it will present the report of the recently concluded national conference before the House for voting.


National ConferenceThe Deputy Speaker and Chairman Special Ad hoc Committee on Constitutional Review, Emeka Ihedioha, said the Committee was set to lay the report before the House for voting upon resumption from the Sallah break.


The notice was made public during sitting on Tuesday.


The House, in line with its legislative calendar, is to proceed on a two-week Sallah break and resume plenary on October 14. The Deputy Speaker, who presided over Tuesday’s sitting, used the opportunity to call on members to make themselves available for the voting, adding that it is pertinent so as to capture the true wishes and aspirations of their constituents in the constitutional review process.


Also at the sitting, Arowosoge Ifeoluwa of the All Progressives Congress, urged the House to condemn the demeaning action of the thugs who attacked a court and beat up a judge and some judicial officials in Ekiti State. He also asked the lawmakers to make an official statement supporting the decision to investigate the matter by the National Judicial Council.


The House obliged him but postponed deliberations on the matter to the next legislative day.


Another matter that came up by way of a Constitutional Order was a motion by Leo Ogor bringing to the attention of the House the lingering report of the Committees on Aid, Debt and Loans and Finance on the $1bn loan solicited by President Goodluck Jonathan to assist in tackling and curbing the menace of insurgency in the country.


Ogor noted that the Speaker of the House, Aminu Tambuwal had earlier directed that the report be made available for the House to consider for approval or rejection. Following this, Ihedioha again directed that the report be laid before the House on the next legislative day.


Meanwhile, the House has passed a resolution mandating its Committee on Water resources to liaise with the Federal Ministry of Water Resources to determine the actual amount required for the completion of the water treatment plant and the irrigation at the Zobe Dam.


The Committee is to also ensure that the required funds are included in any Supplementary Budget for 2014 or in Appropriation Act of 2015, for the completion of the project. The resolution came on the heels of a motion moved by Auwalu Sani.


Sani expressed concern that due to the non-completion of the project, the dam had remained under-utilised for more than 30 years and that the communities around the site have seriously been threatened by floods during rainy seasons.


He attributed the non-completion of the project to incompetence of the contractors who abandoned it after receiving more than 45% of the money released for the work.



Viewed 1 times
Lawmakers to vote on Confab report

Friday, August 22, 2014

Confab has shamed critics, says Jonathan as he receives 22 volumes of report

ABUJA — EXACTLY 158 days after he inaugurated the 2014 National Conference, President Goodluck Jonathan, yesterday, received the report of the confab and vowed that his government would implement the recommendations.


The visibly elated President, who said that Nigerians had shamed critics, who thought the exercise would dismember the country, added that the government would discuss the outcome with the National Assembly and the Council of State on how to implement the report.


President Jonathan meets Nasawawa lawmakers President Jonathan


Among other things, the conference made far reaching recommendations that could boost the socio-economic and political development fortunes of the country, if faithfully implemented.


The recommendations


The recommendations include: Creation of 18 additional states; adoption of modified presidential system of government that integrates the parliamentary and presidential systems; part-time bi-cameral legislature at all levels; re-introduction of the old National Anthem; removal of immunity clause for criminal offences; independent candidacy and abrogation of the local government as a tier of government; scrapping of State Independent Electoral Commissions, SIECs and stoppage of government sponsorships of Christian and Muslim pilgrimages to holy lands.


Others include: Sharing of funds to the Federation Account among the three tiers of government should be: Federal Government (42.5 per cent), State governments (35 per cent) and Local governments (22.5 per cent); in the modified presidential system the president shall pick the vice president from the Legislature and select not more than 18 ministers from the six geo-political zones and not more than 30 per cent of his ministers from outside the Legislature; President should reduce cost of governance by pruning the number of political appointees and using staff of ministries where necessary; presidential power should rotate between the North and the South and among the six geo-political zones, while the governorship will rotate among the three senatorial districts in a state. With local governments no longer the third tier of government, the federal and states are now the only tiers of government, states can now create as many local governments as they want. The Joint State/Local Government Account be scrapped and in its place the establishment of a State RMAFC with representatives of LG and a chairman nominated by the Governor. The Constitution should fix the tenure for Local Government Councils at three years.


The conference also recommended that special courts should handle corruption cases in view of undue prolonged trials and prosecution of corruption cases in the regular courts; and retention of Land Tenure in the Constitution but with an amendment to take care of concerns, particularly compensation in Section 29 (4) of the Act to read “land owners should determine the price and value of their land based on open market value.


The confab, however, could not resolve the issue of resource control, derivation principle and fiscal federalism. It said that assigning percentage for the increase in derivation principle, setting up Special Intervention Funds to address issues of reconstruction and rehabilitation of areas ravaged by insurgency and internal conflicts as well as solid minerals development, require some technical details and consideration. It therefore recommended that the government should set up a Technical Committee to determine the appropriate percentage on the three issues and advise government accordingly.


We’ve shamed our critics – Jonathan


Receiving the report, which is in 22 volumes and totalling 10,335 pages from the Conference Chairman, Justice Idris Legbo Kutigi, a happy President Jonathan said critics who thought the exercise would disintegrate the country have been shamed with the achievements of the delegates.


According to him, all those who had predicted the disintegration of this country at the end of the nation’s first centenary would wish they chose another country against the backdrop that the possibilities of the new vision for Nigeria were being actualised.


He noted that the time has come for all Nigerians to put behind them all the drawbacks that inhibited the country from realising her manifest destiny and full potentials, saying: “We must steadily arrive at the juncture where strife, conflicts and mistrusts would become distant echoes of our past. We must make every inch of our country a space for joyous habitation. Our country must enter a new season of harmony, prosperity and happiness with justice abiding in every hamlet, community and our country. It is the dawn of a new day in Nigeria and the new nation is at the door accompanied by its great men and women, young and old.”


It won’t be a wasted effort


President Jonathan promised that efforts of the 492 delegates will not be a waste as government would ensure that the recommendations were implemented in the interest of the country.


He hailed the delegates for their tireless efforts and coming up with recommendations that will help chart a path of peaceful coexistence, sustainable development, justice and progress as the country marches into the second centenary, and stressed that as delegates, they had done their best, that the onus was now on the executive and elected lawmakers to compliment their job.


He averred that the ability of the delegates to disagree to agree is a clear indication that Nigeria has remained our collective good and we are capable of solving our problems through dialogue.


His words: “The success of this conference has proved the cynics wrong in many respects. Those who dismissed the entire conference ab initio as a “diversion” have been proved wrong as what you achieved has contrary to their forecast diverted our country only from the wrong road to the right direction.


“As I receive the report of your painstaking deliberations, let me assure that your work is not going be a waste of time and resources. We shall do all we can to ensure the implementation of your recommendations which have come out of consensus and not by divisions.


“The result of the conference has shown that we are not enemies, neither are we antagonists, no matter our religion, region, state, and tongue. This conference has reinforced what I have always believed- that Nigeria is here for our collective good.


“The discourse reflected our latest challenges. We shall send the relevant aspects of your recommendations to the Council of State and the National Assembly for incorporation into the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. On our part, we shall act on those aspects required of us in the Executive.


“Let me reaffirm this: Nobody has a monopoly of knowledge. We who are in government need to feed from the thoughts of those who elected us into power. You have done your patriotic duty; we the elected, must now do ours.”


Why I didn’t intervene


President Jonathan, who gave an insight into why he never intervened in their activities of the confab said that he took that decision on the premise that the delegates were capable of coming up with how to move the country forward, adding: “One of the many reasons for our non-interference is this: We have at the conference, 492 delegates and six conference officials who in their individual rights are qualified to lead our great country and if they were unable to agree on how to take decisions, we would be in real trouble! Acknowledging the quality and patriotic content of the delegates, I was confident the right thing will be done.”


Over 600 resolutions approved through consensus –Kutigi


Earlier, Chairman of the Conference, Justice Kutigi disclosed that that at the end of the conference, more than 600 resolutions dealing with issues of law, policy and constitutional amendments were approved through consensus.


Noting that they tackled substantial and fundamental issues, he said adopting all the resolutions through consensus “is a message that we wish the world to hear loud and clear. Nigerians are capable of not only discussing their differences but are also capable of coming up with solutions to these difficulties.”


Justice Kutigi explained that with the submission of the report, “we have finally laid to rest the apprehension that a national conference will lead to the disintegration of Nigeria.



Viewed 1 times
Confab has shamed critics, says Jonathan as he receives 22 volumes of report

Thursday, August 21, 2014

National Conference delegates turn pressure group

Some delegates at the just concluded national conference have formed a major pressure group with the aim of pushing for the implementation of the decisions reached at the conference.


National ConferenceThe group, which was known as “National Consensus Initiative”, was inaugurated few hours before President Goodluck Jonathan declared the conference closed in Abuja on Thursday.


Members of the group vowed to ensure that the report of the conference, which was submitted to the President was fully implemented.


The Interim Coordinator of the group, Mr. Remi Olatubora, who spoke with journalists after the inaugural meeting of the group’s Steering Committee, expressed worry that recommendations and reports of such conferences in the past were not implemented.


He disclosed that the group would work together as advocacy group towards ensuring that “decisions of the conference are not left in the shelf to gather dust in the manner in which the reports of earlier conferences were treated.”


He added that the desire to come together in a group was informed by common desire of most of the delegates that all relevant governmental organs and agencies implement the decisions of the conference.


Members if the group, which cut across the six geo-political zones, were made up of professionals drawn from the academia, law, Civil Society Organisations, Religious bodies, Nigerian Union of Journalist among others.


Olatunbora, said the mission of the group was to engage with issues flowing from the confab, as independent input into the process of consolidating the gains of Nigeria’s centenary, and it’s reconstruction into a responsible, accountable, and egalitarian society.


Other reasons according to him was “To campaign vigorously for gender mainstreaming and inter-generational justice as dedicated by the requirement of 21 century politics.


“To develop a framework for the emergence of an alumni of the confab as the broadest convergence of Pan-Nigerian constituent group.


“To act as a connecting rod between our group and the primary as well as secondary stakeholders in the political sustainability of Nigeria project.”



Viewed 1 times
National Conference delegates turn pressure group

Wednesday, August 13, 2014

Confab: Withdraw draft constitution, Northern delegates tell Kutigi

Northern delegates have further expressed their anger over the national conference’s proposed ‘draft constitution’ by petitioning the Chairman of the conference, Justice Idris Kutigi.


Retired Chief Justice of Nigeria Idris Legbo Kutigi under fire from Northern delegates Retired Chief Justice of Nigeria Idris Legbo Kutigi


They have asked him to withdraw the document from circulation, stressing that its content should not be debated at the plenary.


This was contained in an open letter the northern delegates sent to Kutigi in Abuja on Wednesday.


Titled, ‘New constitution, referendum and adoption of conference report:Issues of serious concern’, the letter was signed by the Chairman and Co-Chairman of the Northern Delegates Forum, Alhaji Ibrahim Coomasie and Gen. Jeremiah Useni (retd.), respectively.


The letter read in part, “We call upon the leadership of the Conference to discountenance and withdraw the Draft Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 2014 and the accompanying Bills, which have been circulated.


“We urge the Conference leadership to table the Draft Conference Report which contains only the resolutions openly and officially sanctioned and adopted by delegates for validation and adoption as provided for under the National Conference Procedure Rules, 2014 and as envisaged in the Work Plan adopted.


“For the avoidance of doubt, we shall not be a party to the adoption of the report or any part thereof by voice vote. We urge the leadership of the Conference to be strictly guided by the Conference Procedure Rules, 2014.”


They said they were shocked when the Secretary of the Conference, Dr. Valerie Azinge, distributed some documents including one entitled ‘Report of the National Conference, 2014 DRAFT CONSTITUTION’, which they said was also accompanied by draft bills to promulgate into law the ‘CONSTITUTION OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA, 2014′.


The delegates insisted in the letter that none of them was party or privy to any decision and did not participate in any processes or proceedings to draft a constitution or bill.


“Quite on the contrary,” the delegates added in the letter, that they had expressed their objections to any such project under any guise.


They said, “Moreover and to the best of our knowledge, we are unaware that the Conference has, whether at plenary or committee stages of its work, taken a decision to draw up a draft constitution, authorised or tasked any of its Committees, delegates or the Conference Secretariat to do so.”


They, therefore, described the origin of the documents as dubious and questionable.


The aggrieved delegates wondered why the ‘suspicious document’ contained what they described as some extraneous issues.


Such issues, according to them, were various provisions pertaining to issues of State Constitution, boundary adjustment, referendum to adopt Constitution, funding for Local Government Areas, and deletion of Land Use Act and the abrogation of all existing laws, which were contained in the contentious draft.


During plenary on Wednesday, which lasted for only about 14 minutes, Kutigi announced plans for accelerated handling of final approval of the draft resolutions.


The Chairman, flanked by his deputy, Prof. Bolaji Akinyemi, the Conference Secretary, Dr. Valerie-Jenete Azinge and the other three principal officers, welcomed the delegates back to the Conference.


He apologised for the postponement of resumption from August 4 to August 11, explaining that it was due to the enormous work that needed to be done to ensure the completion of the draft resolutions.


Kutigi reassured delegates of the inviolability of the draft resolutions, adding: “If there are any errors, they are human errors and not an attempt by the leadership to any play game.”


He further stated that the draft reports of the Conference prepared by the Secretariat were done “to the best of our ability and with all honesty and diligence.”


However, he said as humans, there could be noticeable errors that would be corrected if brought to the attention of the secretariat.


“Any mistake is due to human error and can be corrected,” he said.


The chairman said in line with the resolution of the Conference, the reports were prepared to cover constitutional issues based on amendments agreed upon by the delegates; policy issues meant for implementation by the President; and legislative issues earmarked for enactment into laws by the National Assembly.


Justice Kutigi explained that the copy labeled “draft constitution” contained the various alterations and amendments to the 1999 Constitution “proposed by you.”


After the brief address, some delegates clapped for him.


Justice Kutigi immediately went ahead to spell out the procedure to be adopted by the Conference for consideration and approval of the different reports.


Before adjourning the session, Justice Kutigi announced the presence of a new delegate, Chief Supo Shonibare, who replaced Sir. Olaniwun Ajayi from the South West; and the death of Professor Mohammed Nur.


He jokingly referred to Shonibare as the ‘real addendum’ to the conference and asked Chief Mike Ozhekome (SAN) who has been referring to himself as a Federal Government addendum delegate, to drop the appellation for Shonibare.



Viewed 1 times
Confab: Withdraw draft constitution, Northern delegates tell Kutigi

Tuesday, August 12, 2014

National Conference: Northern delegates reject draft constitution

Northern delegates attending the ongoing National Conference have dissociated themselves from the “New Draft Constitution” made available to all the delegates by the leadership of the conference in Abuja on Monday.


National ConferenceThe northerners said that they were not privy to the emergence of the draft constitution.


The proposed amendment submitted to the delegates was titled, “A bill for an act to further alter the provision of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria(1999) with the first, second and third alteration, and for related matters 2014”.


It was among the three copies of the report of the conference that were handed over to the delegates on Monday when they resumed plenary.


The report would be debated when the conference resumes plenary on Wednesday (today).


But the northern delegates at their meeting, which lasted for several hours in Abuja on Tuesday, vowed that they would never be part of the plot to draft a new constitution for the country.


Speaking with journalists after the meeting, the leader of the group, who is also the Chairman of the Arewa Consultative Forum, Alhaji Ibrahim Coomassie, alleged that some undemocratic forces were working behind the scene at the conference.


He said the conference lacked legal authority, moral right and political reasons to write a new constitution.


Coomassie, who was a former Inspector General of Police, said, “We the Northern Delegates to the conference wish to assure patriotic Nigerians and all lovers of democracy that we are neither privy to, nor were accessory to the emergence of the controversial ‘New Draft Constitution 2014’.


“We , therefore, unequivocally disown it, and emphatically disassociate ourselves from it. Accordingly, we will have nothing to do with it, for the following legal, moral and political reasons.”


Among the reasons cited by him were that delegates to the conference were not elected, and therefore lacked both legal and moral authority to draft a new constitution for the Nigerian Federation.


He said the delegates were merely constituted to serve as an ad hoc advisory mechanism for the President.


But the Yoruba delegates have described the allegation by their northern counterparts as a ploy to blackmail the conference.


Secretary of the Yoruba delegates, Dr. Kunle Olajide, who spoke with our correspondent after the meeting of the group, said it was wrong to say that the conference was writing a new constitution.


He also denied the allegation that the conference had been hijacked by some groups, saying that the leadership of the conference did not involve any of the delegates in putting the agreements reached during their plenary into one.


Olajide said, “There is nothing like tenure elongation, 50 per cent derivation and such in the draft. Nobody was part of the draft; it was a surprise to all of us.


“But the draft consists of all the decisions and amendments taken at the plenary. Amending the existing Constitution will lead to its mutilation.”


Olajide added that the President had executive power to take issues discussed at the conference to the people via referendum.



Viewed 1 times
National Conference: Northern delegates reject draft constitution

Confab delegates may disagree over constitution amendment bill

There are indications that delegates to the ongoing national conference may clash on Wednesday when they reconvene to deliberate on their report.


National ConferenceThe bone of contention is a document titled, “A bill for an act to further alter the provision of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria(1999) with the first, second and third alteration, and for related matters 2014.”


The draft bill is among three copies of the report of the conference that were handed over to the delegates on Monday when plenary resumed for close scrutiny before the final adoption.


The draft report of the conference came in three huge volumes as proposed by the delegates at the end of debate in July.


One part deals with issues pertaining to the constitution, which were issues proposed by each of the 20 committees.


The second part covers resolutions meant for enactment into Acts by the National Assembly while the third part concerns policy issues suggested for implementation by the President.


These were considerations agreed upon by the delegates following the completion of debate and adoption of resolutions arising from reports of the 20 committees.


The Conference Secretary, Dr. Valerie-Jennet Azinge, who addressed the delegates on behalf of the Chairman, Justice Idris Legbo-Kutigi, advised the delegates to study the draft reports before their final adoption.


She said delegates would be granted only two days to read the report and report back for consideration and adoption on Wednesday.


Speaking during the plenary, a delegate, Mallam Sani Zoro, wondered why the delegates were given a draft bill , which he described as a ‘strange document’


He also wondered why the chairman of the conference and his deputy were absent without official explanation.


He said, “Where is the chairman and his deputy? We are concerned about their well -being and security. I’m being reminded that in this era of Ebola, we should ask after everybody.


“We are happy with the draft constitution, which we didn’t expect. It is a strange document and we are going to go through it.”


Another delegate, who is also the Chairman of the Labour Party, Chief Dan Nwanyanwu, said “I also care about the whereabouts of the chairman and his deputy. Tell the leadership that we cannot read these documents and return on Wednesday. Allow us to go and read them throughout the week to enable us contribute.”


At this point, Azinge said she would no longer take contributions from delegates since she had delivered the message sent to her by the chairman of the conference.


When delegates were shouting ‘no, no,’ she said all discussions and deliberations would now hold on Wednesday.


A delegate from the North-West, Prof. Anwal Yadudu, expressed surprise at the inclusion of a draft in the documents handed over to them.


He said that most delegates were not given the opportunity to have any input in the document.


Because of this, he said it would be difficult for them to endorse what they did not discuss and agree on.


Yadudu said, “it is not our duty to do that. Let the President do whatever he likes with the report. It is a waste of time.


“As a delegate, I have no hand in it. I have no input in it. Many of us were not part of it. It is a strange document as far as I’m concerned. We are not here to make a constitution.”


Another delegate, Alhaji Mafindi Isa, said there might have been some misunderstanding among the delegates on the issue.


He said it would be better to allow the issues to be included in the Constitution in the two volumes of documents presented to them.


The bill for an act to further alter the provision of the Constitution includes the proposed 18 states .


If the bill which was sighted by our correspondent on Monday, is passed before 2015, elections might hold in the states.


The proposed states are Aba State to be created from Abia State; Adada State from Enugu State; Amana State from Adamawa State; Anioma State from Delta State; Appa State from Benue State; and Edu State from Niger State


Also listed are Etiti from the South-East; Ghari from Kano State; Gurara from Kaduna State; Kanji from Kebbi and Niger states; Katagum from Bauchi State and Ijebu from Ogun State.


Others are New Oyo from Oyo State; Akana-Anim from Anambra and Imo states; Ogoja from Cross River State, Oil Rivers from Akwa Ibom State; Ose from Ondo State; and Savannah from Borno State.


There are however disagreements among Nigerians over the number of the proposed states.


For instance, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria, who is a conference delegate , Mr. Femi Falana , said he was not in support of the decision.


He said it would be wrong to create new states when majority of the existing ones are currently in financial mess.


But some traditional rulers from Osun State insist that Oduduwa State must be listed among those to be created.


The traditional rulers in their memo to the leadership of the conference, said that it would amount to injustice if states were created without acceding to their demand.


The traditional rulers are the Owa Omiran of Esa-Oke, Oba Adeyemi Adediran; Olojudo of Ido-Osun, Oba Aderemi Adedapo; Alagbon Agbonbiti, Ona Iteade Adewuyi; Apetu of Ipetumodu, Oba Adedokun Adefoke and Laroka of Wanikin, Oba Kole Ojutalayo.


Apart from the traditional rulers, others who signed the memo were a former Minister of Water Resources, Alhaji Bashir Awoyorebo; the President, Ife Development Board, Prof. Mushed Opeloye; and Gbenga Omiwole.


The memo read in part, “It is gratifying to note that the national conference has announced the creation of additional 18 states for the country, two of which are announced for the South-West out of the intended three.


“The two announced are New Oyo and Ijebu states. It is disheartening to note that the proposed Oduduwa State is yet to be listed despite the fact that it is on the memorandum submitted by the National Association of State Movement and Oduduwa State Movement to the conference.’’



Viewed 1 times
Confab delegates may disagree over constitution amendment bill

Saturday, August 2, 2014

Another Confab delegate dies

The Secretariat of the National Conference on Saturday announced the death of a delegate, Prof. Muhammad Nur Alkali.


He was one of the six delegates representing the Supreme Council for Islamic Affairs at the 2014 National Conference in Abuja.


National Conference


A statement by the Assistant Secretary, Media and Communications of the conference, Mr. Akpandem James said Alkali died in his residence in Maiduguri on Friday night at the age of 68.


A Professor of History and two-term Vice Chancellor of the University of Maiduguri (1985 – 1992), the late Alkali was Director General of the Nigeria Institute of Policy and Strategic Studies (NIPSS) and Chairman, Presidential Advisory Committee under the administration of General Sani Abacha.


More recently, he was a member of the Committee on Insecurity in the North East (The Boko Haram Committee).

He will be buried later today, Saturday, August 2, 2014, in Maiduguri.


James said that the Chairman of conference, Justice Idris Kutigi, was “deeply distressed by this sad development and on behalf of the Conference Secretariat and Delegates, has expressed his deep condolences to the family of the late Professor, and the Supreme Council for Islamic Affairs, the platform which Alkali represented at the Conference.”


He said that kutigi also prayed the Almighty receives his spirit and grants his soul sweet repose.


Alkali’s death was preceded by those of Barrister Hamma Misau (a delegate on the platform of the Retired Police officers), from Bauchi State, on Thursday, March 27, 2014; Dr Mohammed Jumare (A delegate from Kaduna State) who died on Monday May 5, 2014 and Professor Dora Akunyili (a delegate who represented Anambra State) on June 7, 2014.



Viewed 1 times
Another Confab delegate dies